Comment: The Future of Bookselling: This I (and You) Believe

(Reader beware: this is a really long one.)

Before I get to what you've said, I want to mention what's being said elsewhere. I promise I didn't plan this timing, but today's editions of The New York Times and Shelf Awareness both have pieces that pertain exactly to the subject(s) of today's posts. "Digital Publishing is Scrambling the Industry's Rules," trumpets the Times, but it's less about e-books than about first chapters posted online, reader talkback on author websites, and a couple of convergence projects combining print and digital mediums. There's the requisite acknowledgement that John Updike is horrified by all this (I missed his speech at BEA, and I can't say I'm terribly sorry), along with some other, more equivocal voices from authors and others in publishing about the potential implications. No booksellers or mention of the effect of this stuff on the means of distribution, but the article is relevant nonetheless.

And almost every piece in Shelf Awareness today seems relevant to me: the civic joy over the expansion of the Tattered Cover in Denver; a piece about the rise of indie wine shops despite the availability of wine at Wal-Mart (because "People come to a wine shop for personality and service. They would much rather look someone in the eye and trust somebody--and laugh with somebody"); a link to a newspaper editorial calling for book buyers to "vote with our pocketbooks"; a meeting of a Vermont-wide local independent business alliance; and this comment from a business school professor about Powell's Books founder Michael Powell: "I'm not sure what the next big thing is, but [Powell] has been involved in several very major big things so far and has made out . . . with really striking efficacy."

So what the heck am I talking about – how are all of these things related? As Andy Laties slyly pointed out, my list of think-questions in the last post "looks like a page of notes to yourself in preparation for the writing of a book proposal." He's right, of course – they were leading questions, which I've been thinking about and answering for myself, and I think they all have to do with the question I posed to all of you:

What is the future of bookselling?

You responded, naturally, with a range of predictions and opinions, and I have to admit I was a bit surprised to find you less optimistic than I would have hoped. The sentiment "independent booksellers and independent publishers will increasingly get absorbed by large corporate entities or put out of business by the same entities … Those existing indies (both booksellers and publishers) would survive because they speak to a very niche market, who hears, loves, supports, and respects them" was a representative one, expressing the idea that indies will survive only insofar as they find niche markets.

This was extended to "Independents will continue to lose market share, and… will be able to survive mostly as elite boutiques / niche specialty stores… providing a distinctive service and selection to a dedicated audience, whether it's literati, scholars, activists, etc. etc. I think this only works well in cities, though."

Other dire predictions for bookstores: "publishers will… start to sell more and more books direct to consumers," "the Federal Trade Commission might rule that in the U.S. as in England, B&N and Borders as a combination will not be a monopoly," and "I personally cannot see the need to continue to publish large legal research books that are now available on the computer" (a comment that speaks to the struggles of university stores in particular). Yep, there are certainly a growing number of alternatives to buying a book in a bricks-and-mortar, independent, locally-owned bookstore, and things could just get worse.

But there was also some fierce, if wary, optimism to be found in your comments. Way back on that May 24 post, you said "I personally believe there's room for booksellers big and small in the marketplace…The book industry as a whole needs to step up the pace with the ever changing and growing world of the internet but not neglect the brick 'n' motar shops. It's a tricky balance but it can be done."

You booksellers said: "We lost all those storefronts BEFORE the rise of online bookselling, and with the rise of a new generation of storefront indie booksellers, people will cut back on their internet bookbuying and spend more time out hobnobbing with neighbors in all the swell new indie bookstores." And "indies are finally figuring out that… trying to replicate the Big Corporate Bookselling model on a smaller scale is a waste of time, effort, and money…Don't be afraid to be an INDEPENDENT BRICKS-AND-MORTAR BOOKSTORE. It's a ton of work, but there's no better way to spend a lifetime."

You consumers and readers said "I can only assume and hope that the printed book will continue to grow a devoted readership that will savor the physical pleasure that one can only get from an actual book." And "I feel like where I spend my money these days is just as important, if not more so, as who and what I vote for. And I want to cast my "money vote" for people who are passionate about what they do, who are interested in the world around them, and who consider how they affect change in the world."

You publishers [if this is the Ben I think it is] said "indies can narrowcast to their customers, and if the current conventional wisdom about the coming fragmentation/segmentation of media and cultural taste is right, narrowcasting is the future. Indies can't offer every option under the sun, like a cable system or a superstore, but they can offer you, specifically, what you want -- and better than anyone else. "

Hell yeah.

So here's what I have to add. I asked about Local First, Slow Food and organic movements because I think all of these trends are symptoms of a widespread dissatisfaction with the mass-produced, executive-board-run, corporate, impersonal, huge scale economy and culture that has been on the rise in the United States maybe since the industrial revolution. It's a big claim to make, but I think the tide is turning, at least in some places and to some degree. That doesn't mean we're all going to go back to farming, but it means that a lot of people are realizing that not every kind of "rationalization" is actually good for business or for humanity, that we can be progressive technologically AND progressive ethically and socially, that we can think big and stay small. I don't think Barnes & Noble, Borders or Amazon are to blame for the ills of society; in fact, I think they can serve a valuable function in getting books to underserved markets. But if I can quote my favorite silly White Stripes song:

"Well you're in your little room
And you're workin' on somethin' good
But if it's really good
You're gonna need a bigger room
And when you're in the bigger room
You might not know what to do
You might have to think of
How you got started
Sittin' in your little room"

We're all in the process of thinking back to how we got started, taking our really good big thing and remembering what makes it good.

This doesn't mean independent bookstores should be an attempt to freeze time, or go back to some idealized past. As the comment about Mr. Powell shows, indies have the potential to be right in the thick of the next big thing. Independent presses like Kelly Link's Small Beer Press are finding that publishing portions of books for free online doesn't hurt their sales, it builds word of mouth. Independent bookstores like Atomic Books in Baltimore are finding that for their market, having a website with a daily blog and all their inventory for sale online is very attractive to their customers, and keeps them coming in to the brick-and-mortar store. McNally Robinson in New York was the first bookstore to stage a remote author event using the LongPen technology (it didn't work very well, but it was interesting). Those in the book industry who treat new technologies and ways of reading not as threats, but as opportunities, will be the ones who will carry literacy into the future, in whatever form it takes.

There's an author quoted at the end of the Times article about the futility of positing ourselves as the defenders of civilization, barring the gates against the barbarians; his contention is that the barbarians will burn us to the ground and "put a parking lot over [our] sacred grounds." I'd agree with his warning, though not with his prediction. I think, as tends to happen in even the bloodiest of cultural clashes, the barbarians will inherit some of the old civilization's values and achievements, and the old guard will pick up some of the barbarians' new insights and skills, until it's hard to tell the difference between defender and barbarian, and some newer, stronger thing will continue to go forward drawing from the contributions of each.

Lastly, I think it's ultimately a silly question that I've asked, because the future of bookselling in New York City is probably not the same as its future in Fargo, or San Diego, or Istanbul, or even upstate New York. Similar issues will play out in different ways depending on local demographics and the personalities who get involved, and we'll win some and we'll lose some.

For me, the future of bookselling looks like a medium-to-large general independent bookstore in a frontier neighborhood in Brooklyn. It looks like a place that serves white, African-American, and Latino communities, kids and adults and families and singles, literary readers and pop readers, rich people and poor people and middle-class people, and that remains super sensitive to what its customers ask for and need, while continuing to carry what its booksellers think is wonderful and worthwhile. It looks like a place that understands that what's valuable about a brick-and-mortar store isn't just the ink-and-paper books, it's the one-on-one human interaction, and trains its employees accordingly, and makes itself a resource for the community accordingly. It looks like a place that creates events that emphasize not only authors of new books by major houses, but self-published authors, not-yet-published authors, even long-dead authors, and offers the wondrous, exuberant, real-time, real-people appeal of a carnival. It looks like a place that mentors the next generation, that is eager to embrace new possibilities while retaining all that is valuable from the tradition which created it. It looks like something that, with luck and flexibility and a lifetime of work, might last forever.

Okay, I'm a starry-eyed, bull-headed optimist. But I think we make the future by predicting it. And all I can really predict about the future of bookselling is that I'll be doing it, whatever it looks like.


Feel free to comment if you feel so moved. I imagine you and I have a lot more to say on this subject, and it will continue to get said in the posts to come. Wednesday I want to move on to another aspect of the future of bookselling: the Emerging Leaders Project.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Books and independent booksellers are survivors. Radio...we survived. Film...we survived. Television...audiobooks...the internet...Big Corporate Boxes...we survived we survived we survived.

There are only two life-threatening enemies out there. The first is publishers that chase trends. They've been doing this for a decade now, and have accomplished nothing (except a cheapening of their brands). Publishers should be leading this industry...and if they're not, someone else will step in...and then all bets are off.

The second threat is Booksellers Without Imagination. These "Booksense or Bust" types might as well go work for Borders. They are doomed to failure. They show up to work every day and demonstrate how mediocre an independent bookstore can be. They hurt us all. (Ever wonder why the strength of Big Corporate Boxes seems to grow in direct proportion to the strength of Booksense? Think about it.)
Anonymous said…
The amazingly optimistic feelings among a large sector of the public in the late 80s about the likely success of any given brand new independent bookstore turned out to be disastrous for a group of major corporations. This upstart can-do mentality dramatically destabilized the publishing and bookselling businesses. It was imperative to not only tamp down the growth of indie bookselling, but also to ensure that never again would thousands of people open their own indie bookstores all at once, and never again would the general public view new indie bookstores as inherently superior to the corporate-controlled outlets.

Why? Big publishers wanted sales outlets they could control, in terms of what books these outlets would purchase and promote. Predictability is perceived by managers at publishing houses as enormously desirable. They can get a measure of predictability from chain retail outlets who will guarantee shelf-space in exchange for ad-payments. Indie booksellers generally refuse to promote "just any" book a publisher desperately wishes to promote.

So -- let's look at all this incredible trash-talking regarding the impossibility of independent bookselling, the inevitable doom of independent bookselling, etc.

Who benefits from this nonsense??

A sudden reprise of the 80s boom in entrepreneurialism among book-lovers, resulting in a dramatic upsurge in storefront openings will hurt:

1) Current chainstores,
2) Current indie bookstores,
3) Corporate publishers

Also: Amazon, Google -- any online booksellers -- anyone who's trying to stake a claim as the Inevitable Victor.

So I'd argue that there is in effect a disinformation campaign being waged by publicity firms and publicity departments and that this is being parroted and amplified by ignorant or pliant media voices.

A few thousand of the 200,000 people now employed in the book industry, if they act in a roughly simultaneous fashion, drawing on their terrific skills, working together to launch lots of indie bookstores, will silence all these foolish words about the death of independent bookselling.

No: It's the death of big-box bookselling, the weakening of corporate-conglomerate publishing, the weakening on online-exclusive booksellers (online bookselling will become a subsector of bricks-and-mortar bookselling) -- THAT'S what's in the wind.

Trash talk. Trying to scare us.

Andy Laties
Anonymous said…
Andy-
Then how do you explain the frequent deaths and continuing ill-health of so many established, well-run independents? None of the veteran booksellers I know is sanguine about the future either of their own independent or of independents as a class. I'm not talking trash, I desperately want indies to thrive. But I just don't smell the death of big-box anything in the wind. The demographics, the economics and the (national) culture are stacked against the independent. Can you imagine a movement of thousands of new independent hardware stores opening up and seriously threatening home depot? Of course not. Even if they could cause some minor annoyance to the big boxes, they wouldn't have deep enough pockets to survive a war. And of course, books are different from hardware, but the same macro forces are at work.

Now, it could be that the price clubs and merchandisers (walmart/target etc.) will continue to hurt the bookstore chains, as they have been doing for a while. Maybe they'll take over so much of the market, undercut the chains so much that they'll drive Borders over the edge of the cliff. But even if that happens, and some market share opens up, how do these theoretical legions of new independents compete where the deep-pocketed chains couldn't? I don't know if opening an independent made sense from a purely entrepreneurial standpoint in the 80s, but it most certainly doesn't now. The only reason to do it is because you love it, and the only way to do it is with a full appreciation of the ways in which the deck is stacked against you. It's not impossible, failure isn't inevitable, more people should have the fortitude and idealism to try it (I hope I will one day) -- but they should know what they're getting into.
Anonymous said…
I think a lot of people thought the same thing back in the early 80s when tons of indies had gone under because of Crown, Dalton and Walden.

In 1959 there were 10,000 indies. In 1982 there were fewer than 2,000 left. Because of aggressive outreach work on the part of ABA in the 80s, by 1991 we were back up to 5100 indies, and Crown was in trouble and later went backrupt, with Dalton and Walden merely appendages to the new chains: the illicitly publisher-subsidized former-indies B&N and Borders.

Neither B&N nor Borders is a particularly large or stable corporation. Why hasn't a big media conglomerate bought either one of them? They're not a "safe" bet!

As you point out, the huge general-merch discount retailers are a gigantic threat to the current big-box bookstores because companies like Wal-Mart are 50 times as large as Barnes & Noble. But this is the exactly the point: B&N isn't very large by American corporate terms. So, a thousand new indie bookstores entering the market in the next three years would substantially cut into B&N and Borders's market share, and would alarm the stock market analysts enough to harm their share prices.

Yes, I do believe an attack is possible. I do believe that history shows that the current bookstore chains can have their market share taken from them.
Anonymous said…
Here's a great example of a corporate publisher..in this case Time Warner (or Hachette or whatever)...cheapening its brand by making short term, trend-following decisions...

If you go to Amazon, you can find remaindered copies of Alice Sebold's bestseller, "The Lovely Bones" (ISBN 0316168815). Amazon is selling this trade paperback at a 61% discount. (Which means Hachette probably sold them these copies at LESS THAN HALF the price the price that I'd pay to bring it into the store.) That's right...the trade paperback edition, not a hardcover...of a title that is still sought out on a daily basis.

Publishers (and we booksellers) are already crying in our sleep about the drop in hardcover sales. What could you expect? Bookbuyers have been trained to wait for the paperback. And Hachette's solution? Train customers to wait for the overstock copies!!

Hachette is following all the hottest trends with this one...a large scale distributor, the internet, used books...

...so congratulations, Hachette! You've just turned one of your strongest sellers into something that...well, is just not very special...

...and what has this to do with the future of bookselling? Hachette's actions...the cheapening of its brand to meet short term financial goals...are the actions of a player that is ceding its leadership position in the industry. When all the corporate publishers have become tails, rather than dogs, someone is going to rebuild the entire book world. And that's going to change my life...just don't know how...
Anonymous said…
hi,

i'm probably a little late on this one. Just googled "future of bookselling" as i've been thinking on this a bit lately (i've been a campus bookseller for 5 years now & a book person my whole life) - your blog is right at the top. Anyhow here's my take on the future of bookselling. Print on demend technology will drop in price. Book production will move from the work of publishers to that of booksellers who will licence the right to print individual copies (at a nominal price) for the customer. Books aren't going anywhere & neither is specialist bookseller knowledge
Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said…
"I think independent bookstores can be a source for culture, community, and social justice. "

Hey, just to say thank you for all these words. I totally agree… from Paris ! I work in a bookstore too, and still want to be as optimistic as you :)
Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Unknown said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said…
Rather interesting place you've got here. Thanks the author for it. I like such themes and everything that is connected to them. I would like to read a bit more soon.

Sincerely yours
Jeph Normic
Unknown said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
aai333 said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Unknown said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Unknown said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Unknown said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ai said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Unknown said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Unknown said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Unknown said…
No matter what product you purchase from us north face jacketsWe are offering you a wide range ofnorth face outletquestion,Some color combinations seem to never get old north face outerwearBut within the same community north face coatsbecause it features just the right amount of north face uk,look at another good paoduct such as Dior totes,A little of these are given below.ugg bootswas a very well-known French fashionable boot
cheap ugg boots,because of the wisdom of brilliant featuresdiscount ugg boots,which you are buying is unique and original classic ugg boots,When possible, they obtain materials from domestic suppliers ugg classic tall boots,which makes it exclusive and uniquebabyliss,I like the other two designs as wel Benefit GHD,A stroll around the park with the GHD IV Salon Styler,They're also used to buy GHD Mini Styler,A stroll around the park with GHD Precious gift,They're also used to help prevent
GHD Rare Styler,Following the success of the initial gray ghd,The extremity of the sole is gold ghd
And those who buy this ghd Instyler,people who work outside and so wearisome Kiss ghd,I would recommend moving up to pink ghd,If your own walks or intentions for this pure black ghd,I wouldn’t hesitate to recommend the pure white ghd,our price is very reasonable purple ghd
aai333 said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
aai333 said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ai said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Unknown said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

Popular posts from this blog

"Switchblades, bicycle chains and adventuresome tailors": Colson Whitehead on Brooklyn literary culture

Link-Mad Monday: BEA 2007 and On!

House.